Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00703
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soomro v. Braker-Park LP et al
as 4:2014cv01748
Plaintiff:
Nisar Soomro
Defendant:
Braker-Park LP, Fuel Management GP LLC, Leemak LP and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Camacho v. Northwest Petroleum, LP et al
as 1:2013cv00304
Plaintiff:
Marisol Camacho
Defendant:
Leemak GP LLC, Leemak Jarrell, LLC and Northwest Petroleum, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2005md01720
Interested Party:
Parkside Movies 14, Hampton Allied Pharmacy, Mon Ami Gabi Development LLC, DBA Mon Ami Gabi - Oakbrook and others
Not Classified By Court:
Keewatin Sinclair, Valentine Stores, Inc., Alsaker Corp/Broadway Truck Stops and others
Plaintiff:
Joe's Crab Shack - Abingdon MD, Inc., William-Sonoma Inc., Plaintiffs in Twisted Spoke v. Visa U.S.A., Inc., et al. 05-cv-5881 JG-JO and others
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Karla F. Solis, D.D.S., Inc. d/b/a LA Holistic Dentistry, Mr Gary Friedman and others
Defendant:
Defendants in civil action G.E.S. Bakery, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A., Inc,. et al. 05-cv-5879 JG-JO, Wells Fargo & Company, Defendants in civil action Performace Labs, Inc. v. American Express Travel Related Services Co., Inc., et al 05-cv-5869 JG-JO and others
Amicus Curiae:
The European Commission, Canadian counsel for defendants in Canadian litigation received from and filed by hand by Canadian counsel, Amici Objecting States and others
Interpleader:
MNZ Inc
Respondent:
Visa Inc.
Intervenor:
Keila Ravelo and Mary Watson
3Rd Party Defendant:
Discover
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oneota Community Food Co-op
Claimant:
St. Louis Airport Taxi, LLC.
In Re:
Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
