Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Neal v. Lovett, et al
as 23-1033
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENARD DARNELL NEAL
Defendant / Appellee:
LOVETT, Warden, M. STARR, Wardeh, DEANTON, Associate Warden and others
Hall v. Tulsa County Jail et al
as 4:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hall and Christopher K Hall
Defendant:
Tulsa County Jail, Summit Food Service and Chaplain Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins v. LNU et al
as 1:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wiggins
Defendant:
FNU LNU, David Gonzalez, Alisha Tafoya Lucero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaulding v. Nunn et al
as 5:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Richard Patrick Spaulding
Defendant:
Warden Scott Nunn, Asst Warden Edward Mayfield, Chaplain FNU Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lambkins, et al
as 21-1340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LAMBKINS, PEEK, COMBEE and others
Redick v. McKiearnan, et al
as 21-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW REDICK
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE MCKIEARNAN, AUSTIN CHANNELL, STEVE MCKIEARNAN, Chaplain, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, in his official and individal capacity and others
Defendant:
DON LANGFORD, ROGER WERHOLTZ, LARNED CORRECTIONAL MENTAL HEALTH FACILITY and others
Johnson v. Barnes, et al
as 21-1066
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. WENCE, Chaplain John Doe and SGT. JUAN BARNES
Defendant:
MICHAEL HALE and WARDEN RYAN LONG
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Williams, et al
as 21-1058
Defendant / Appellee:
CASADY, CHAD, KILPOLITES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Lotches, et al
as 21-1045
Defendant / Appellee:
BUNKS, SHOEMAKER, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Johnson v. Little, et al
as 21-1042
Defendant / Appellee:
SHOEMAKER, CHAD, COLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
