Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc. v. Lewis
as 1:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc.
Defendant:
Phillip Lewis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tyger Manufacturing LLC v. Mike's Worldwide LLC
as 21-1567
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TYGER MANUFACTURING LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
MANISH CHANDER, aka Manish Chandra, aka Mike Chander, dba MWI, MIKE'S NOVELTIES, INC. and MIKE'S WORLDWIDE LLC
National Labor Relations Board v. Madelaine Chocolate Novelties,
as 20-3861
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc.
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, v. National Labor Relations Board
as 20-3665
Petitioner:
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
The Topps Company, Inc. v. Koko's Confectionery
as 20-2332
Defendant / Appellee:
KOKO'S CONFECTIONERY & NOVELTY, a Division of A & A Global Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THE TOPPS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
KOKO'S CONFECTIONERY & NOVELTY, INC.
Mikes Novelties, Inc. v. Grav, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00910
Defendant:
David Daily and Grav, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mikes Novelties, Inc.
Atlantic Candy Company et al v. Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc.
as 1:2017mc02741
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Candy Company and Henry Whetstone, Jr.
Defendant:
Madelaine Chocolate Novelties, Inc.
Novelty, Inc. v. DEA
as 08-1296
Petitioner:
Novelty, Inc.
Respondent:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Michele M. Leonhart, In her official capacity as Deputy Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, United States Department of Justice and others
Lanard Toys Limited et al v. Novelty, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01725
Plaintiff:
Lanard Toys Limited and Lanard Toys, Inc.
Defendant:
Novelty, Inc., Novelty Wholesale, Inc., Novelty Transportation, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
