Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Nunez v. State of Utah
as 1:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
David Alonso Nunez
Respondent:
State of Utah
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States v. Nunez-Aguilar
as 23-3196
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO NUNEZ-AGUILAR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bates v. Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Roland Keith Bates
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cleveland County Oklahoma, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Red Rock Behavioral Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lornes v. White et al
as 1:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes
Defendant:
White, Donald Nunez, Audet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Osborne-Franklin v. Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County et al
as 5:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
Shauntae Osborne-Franklin
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Cleveland County, Chris Amason, Blake Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lornes v. Johnson, et al
as 22-1393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM L. LORNES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON, WHITE, DONALD NUNEZ and others
Lornes v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv02730
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes
Defendant:
Johnson, White, Donald Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Carter
as 1:2022cv01475
Petitioner:
Charles Nunez
Defendant:
Elizabeth Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nunez v. Carter
as 1:2022cv01476
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Nunez
Respondent:
Elizabeth Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
