Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Green
as 3:2024cv03019
Defendant:
Joleen Jones
Plaintiff:
Steven Lloyd Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Buechler et al v. Jones
as 4:2024cv04155
Plaintiff:
Austin Leisinger and Tieryn Buechler
Defendant:
Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Jones v. US Department of Veterans Affairs
as 4:2024cv04115
Defendant:
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Brad Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jones v. O'Malley et al
as 4:2024cv04102
Plaintiff:
Nayda Jones
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bell v. Tjeerdsma et al
as 4:2024cv04068
Plaintiff:
Shane Douglas Bell
Defendant:
Kelly Tjeerdsma, Brian Foley, Kelly Wasko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01005
Plaintiff:
Okokipe Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Carter v. South Dakota Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2022cv04103
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carter
Defendant:
South Dakota Dept. of Corrections, Kellie Wasko, Dan Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Shaw v. Wasko et al
as 4:2022cv04054
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Shaw
Defendant:
Kelly Wasko, Dan Sullivan, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spotted Elk v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv04031
Defendant:
Jessica Cook, Jeannie Bertch, Darrin Young and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gregory Spotted Elk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
