Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Office of the Clerk for the United States District Court, Office of the Clerk for the United States Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv01640
Petitioner:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Respondent:
Unknown Party, Roslyn O Silver, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Office of the Clerk for the United States District Court, Office of the Clerk for the United States Court of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv00882
Petitioner:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Respondent:
Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Judicial Department of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2022cv00718
Petitioner:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Respondent:
Unknown Party, Judicial Branch of the United States, United States District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy-Richardson #333262 v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ismael Antonio Murphy-Richardson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States District Court, Superior Court of the State of Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
