Cases 1 - 10 of 40
In re Naturalization Ceremony 9/13/2023
as 3:2023mc80224
In Re:
Naturalization Ceremony, Oleksandra Boiko Acosta, Neftaly de Jesus Aguilar Rodriguez and others
Latour v. Latour
as 4:2022cv02459
Petitioner:
Pierre Oliver Latour and Pierre-Olivier Oliver Latour
Respondent:
Nooshin Latour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gagne v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv06098
Plaintiff:
Olivier Gagne
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Siqueiros v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2016cv07244
Plaintiff:
Monteville Sloan, Jr., Raul Siqueiros, Joseph Brannan and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Intervenor:
Manuel Fernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Bushansky v. Prologis, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04320
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Prologis, Inc., Hamid R. Moghadam, Irving F. Lyons, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv08093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Olivier Bassil et al v. Jacques Webster et al
as 2:2020cv05099
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lasnier, Lukas Benjamin Leth and Olivier Bassil
Defendant:
Cactus Jack Records, LLC, Jacques Webster, Sony ATV Music Publishing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
