Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Roscoe Chambers v. David Ebbert, et al
as 20-3472
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID J EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Debtor / Appellee:
OLSHESKIE
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3394
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Roscoe Chambers v. Ebbert, et al
as 19-3135
Defendant / Appellee:
J. MOYER, WARDEN DAVID EBBERT, CERNEY, DHO Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Chambers v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2018cv01009
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, M.D. Carvajol, Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shelton v. Bledsoe et al
as 4:2011cv00368
Plaintiff:
Norman N Shelton
Defendant:
Warden Bledsoe, A. W. Young, Trate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Derrick Brown v. David Olsheskie, et al
as 10-1962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OLSHESKIE, SCSS, et al, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, Warden, et al, MAIL ROOM CLERKS-USP LEWISBURG and others
Derrick Brown v. David Olsheskie, et al
as 09-4489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OLSHESKIE, SCSS, et al, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, Warden, et al, MAIL ROOM CLERKS-USP LEWISBURG and others
Brown v. Olsheskie et al
as 3:2009cv01742
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brown
Defendant:
David A. Olsheskie, B.A. Bledsoe, Mail Room Clerk's-USP Lewisburg, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ALCOCK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63022
Plaintiff:
RITA G ALCOCK, THOMAS APITSCH, LILYANETTA BERGER and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., OWENS CORNING, GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
