Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.22 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01372
Defendant:
0.97 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, West Alton, City of, Williams Communications, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01367
Defendant:
2.54 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.46 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01365
Defendant:
David L. Machens, 0.23 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.46 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01369
Defendant:
0.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Mary E. Mintert, City of West Alton and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.47 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01368
Defendant:
0.38 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Carol J. Connoyer, Eugene E. Beckham & Janet L. Beckham Revocable Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 2.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01366
Defendant:
2.49 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, City of Portage des Sioux, 1.99 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 0.91 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01373
Defendant:
The Verona M. Kampmann Revocable Trust Dated April 22, 2004, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County, 0.91 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.68 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01351
Defendant:
0.82 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 1.36 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Collector of Revenue of St. Charles County and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.55 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01361
Defendant:
Shell Pipe Line Corporation, 0.77 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 4.70 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01356
Defendant:
Central Bank of St. Louis, 2.58 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, City of Portage des Sioux and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
