Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Mitchell v. Hill et al
as 5:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Sara Elizabeth Hill, Catina R Drywater, Rachel Marie Dallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevillion vs. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00473
Defendant:
Jeff Trevillion, Scott Owen, James Wathen, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCalister v. Owens et al
as 4:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon McCalister
Defendant:
Scotty Owens, John Copeland, James Pendelgraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes and Salinda Eve Hayes
Defendant:
Jon Copeland, Michael Kitchens, Kristen Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes et al v. Owen et al
as 4:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Anita Jean Hayes, Salinda Eve Hayes and MDH
Defendant:
Scott Owen, Jon Copeland, Washington County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Marty Allen Owens
Respondent:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Owens et al
as 4:2022cv00056
Petitioner:
Michael Guy Smith
Respondent:
Scott Owens and Lieutenant Pendergraft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Owen
as 4:2021cv00226
Petitioner:
Michael Smith
Respondent:
Scott Owen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Owens v. Garfield County Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Christopher Bailey, John Burton, Garfield County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vue v. Henke et al
as 5:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
Ong Vue
Defendant:
Frank X Henke, Ernest E Haynes, Michael W Roach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
