Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Owen v. Reyes et al
as 4:2024cv04042
Petitioner:
Lance George Owen
Respondent:
Warden Reyes and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grady v. Pennington County et al
as 5:2023cv05081
Plaintiff:
Adam Owen Grady
Defendant:
Pennington County, Kellie Wasko, Brent Fluke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Fluke et al
as 5:2023cv05075
Petitioner:
Adam Owen Grady
Respondent:
Warden Brent Fluke and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dumarce v. Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe et al
as 1:2017cv01012
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dumarce
Defendant:
Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux Tribe, Bill Owens and Gary Gaikowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. Young et al
as 4:2015cv04087
Plaintiff:
Lance G. Owen
Defendant:
Darin Young, Troy Ponto, Jan Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owen v. Young
as 4:2013cv04079
Plaintiff:
Lance George Owen
Defendant:
Darin Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cottier v. Schaeffer et al
as 4:2011cv04112
Plaintiff:
James A. Cottier
Defendant:
Steve Schaeffer , Bruce Millikan , Terry Persing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottier v. Schaeffer et al
as 5:2011cv05026
Plaintiff:
James A. Cottier
Defendant:
Steve Schaeffer, Bruce Millikan, Terry Persing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jaeschke v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2010cv05034
Plaintiff:
Randy Jaeschke
Defendant:
South Dakota Department of Corrections, Tim Reisch, Douglas Weber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cody v. Loen et al
as 4:2009cv04169
Plaintiff:
William Cody
Defendant:
Douglas Loen, Derrick Bieber, Dennis Block and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
