Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Maione v. Zucker
as 22-782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott Maione and Tasha Ostler
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Samuel D. Roberts, Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Darlene Oto, Principal Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Defendant:
Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, Office of Administrative Hearings, Nirav Shah, Former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Kirsten M. Proud, Former Commissioner of the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Not Classified By Court:
Department of Justice
Maione v. Zucker
as 20-3658
Defendant:
Flo Mercer, Office of Administrative Hearings (OTDA), Compliance Coordinator, Adrienne Alcaro, Former Rockland Medicaid Director, Nirav Shah, Former Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tasha Ostler and Scott Maione
Defendant / Appellee:
Joan Silvestri, Commissioner, Rockland County, Department of Social Services, Dr. Howard A. Zucker, Commissioner of the New York State Department of Health, Darlene Oto, Principal Hearing Officer, Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-182
Plaintiff:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-185
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-180
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 16-3941
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. Cuomo
as 16-3927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
Governor Andrew Cuomo, Eric T. Scheiderman, NYS Attorney General, New York State Unified Court System, 4th Judicial District and others
Clark v. Cuomo
as 14-417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
Governor Andrew Cuomo, Eric T. Scheiderman, NYS Attorney General, Unified Court System of the State of New York, 4th Judicial District and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
