Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
UNIVERSAL POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, INC. et al v. IRON BAR, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv06411
Plaintiff: UNIVERSAL POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING, INC. , EMI APRIL MUSIC INC. , BIBLE BLACK and others
Defendant: IRON BAR, LLC, CAVANAUGH HOLDINGS, LLC, JAMES A. CAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04194
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BHATT v. HOFFMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv00005
Plaintiff: CHAULA S. BHATT
Defendant: JOHN JAY HOFFMAN, MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER, NJ, WILLIAM MOSCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OH v. LEE et al
as 2:2011cv00974
Plaintiff: JU YEON OH
Defendant: JUN SEOG LEE , J MGMT CO., INC. , J. MGMT. CO., LLC and others
Thirdparty_defendant: Ga Bin Choi, Peter Kim, Nammi Immigration Corp and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: JUN SEOG LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. JY & P, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv06501
Plaintiff: RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant: JY & P, INC., JOHN Y. RHEE and PIL KEUN OH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. HM QUICK MART, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04382
Plaintiff: PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.
Defendant: HM QUICK MART, INC., OH MAIN LLC and DOES ONE through TEN, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
IM v. BEAUTY PLUS TRADING CO. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv04754
Plaintiff: ALEXIS IM
Defendant: BEAUTY PLUS TRADING CO., CHANG MOO LEE, HYUN MOO LEE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Both
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. OH et al
as 2:2007cv04572
Plaintiff: RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant: JOSEPH OH and ESTHER OH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?