Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-4002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00482
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Glaser v. Smith et al.
as 4:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
Donald S. Glaser
Defendant:
Correction Officer Austin Smith, Correction Officer Scott Gorby, Correction Officer Philip Carter and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Ohio Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2021cv01947
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Wolfe, III
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Major Tim McConahay, Corrections Officers John Jane Doe 1-25 and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Coleman v. Burgh et al
as 2:2021cv03935
Plaintiff:
Roger Coleman
Defendant:
Lieutenant Burgh, Warden Emma Collins, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Burgh et al
as 2:2021oe03935
Plaintiff:
Roger Coleman
Defendant:
Lieutenant Burgh, Warden Emma Collins, Director Annette Chambers-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
