Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Omar Gay v. Amy Parsons, et al
as 21-16906
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY
Defendant / Appellant:
AMY PARSONS, Senior Psychologist and GREGORY S. GOLDSTEIN, Psychologist
Defendant:
JENNIFER SHAFFER, Secretary, Board of Parole Hearings and CLIFF KUSAJ, Chief Psychologist
Omar Gay v. Jennifer Shaffer, et al
as 20-15249
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH ALLEN, TIMOTHY O'HARA, JENNIFER SHAFFER, Secretary, Board of Parole Hearings and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY
Omar Gay v. Amy Parsons, et al
as 19-16662
Defendant / Appellant:
AMY PARSONS, Senior Psychologist and GREGORY S. GOLDSTEIN, Psychologist
Defendant:
CLIFF KUSAJ, Chief Psychologist and JENNIFER SHAFFER, Secretary, Board of Parole Hearings
Plaintiff / Appellee:
OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY
(PC) Gay v. Shaffer
as 2:2019cv01471
Defendant:
Timothy O'Hara, Kenneth Allen, Elizabeth Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Sharrieff Gay v. Jennifer Shaffer
as 2:2019cv06402
Defendant:
Timothy O'Hara, Kenneth Allen, Elizabeth Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2016cv02533
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Cliff Kusaj, Amy Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2016cv05998
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Cliff Kusaj, Amy Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Shaffer et al
as 3:2016cv05998
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Cliff Kusaj, Amy Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omar Gay v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 12-57098
Petitioner - Appellant:
OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden and ROBERT DOYLE
Omar Gay v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 12-56053
Petitioner - Appellant:
OMAR SHARRIEFF GAY
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
