Cases 121 - 130 of 232
DeYoung v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2012cv02042
Petitioner:
Rulon Frederick DeYoung
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ward v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2012cv01983
Petitioner:
Joel Nathan Ward
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2012cv01920
Petitioner:
Mark Leon Perez
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2013cv00705
Petitioner:
Roberto Lopez
Defendant:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Chappell
as 5:2012cv05115
Petitioner:
Corey Williams
Respondent:
Kevin Chappell
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center, Michael Millman and Ann P. Wathen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Lee v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2012cv01514
Petitioner:
Terry Dewayne Lee
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weaver v. Chappell
as 3:2012cv02140
Petitioner:
Latwon Weaver
Respondent:
Kevin Chappell
Miscellaneous_party:
California Appellate Project, Habeas Corpus Resource Center and Attorney General, State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weaver v. Chappell
as 3:2012cv04514
Petitioner:
Latwon Weaver
Respondent:
Kevin Chappell
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project, Habeas Corpus Resource Center and Attorney General, State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crew v. Martel et al
as 4:2012cv04259
Petitioner:
Mark Christopher Crew
Respondent:
Michael Martel , Attorney General State of California and Kevin Chappell
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project, Michael Millman, Michael David Laurence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steve Woodruff v. Warden Kevin Chappell
as 2:2012cv06945
Respondent:
Kevin Chappell
Interested Party:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Petitioner:
Steve Woodruff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
