Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Verser v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv01263
Plaintiff:
Glenn Verser
Defendant:
Stephen Duncan, Michael Gilreath, Jason Zollars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. IDOC Director et al
as 3:2015cv01060
Plaintiff:
Brandon Brooks
Defendant:
I.D.O.C. Director, Duncan, John Doe, 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Yurkovich et al
as 3:2015cv50195
Plaintiff:
Vincent Carter
Defendant:
Joseph Yurkovich, Donald Stolworthy, Nedra Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pyle et al
as 1:2015cv01326
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Pyle, Christopher Leipold, John Zook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Verser v. Duncan et al
as 3:2015cv03221
Plaintiff:
Glenn Verser
Defendant:
Stephen Duncan, Michael Gilreath, Jason Zollars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Kcaushaer et al
as 1:2015cv01311
Plaintiff:
Dwaine Coleman
Defendant:
Kraushoar, . Eutsey, Orange Crush Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Korte et al
as 3:2015cv03215
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bowman
Defendant:
Jeffrey Korte, Law, Orange Crush Tactical Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Cordrey v. Richard Harrington, et al
as 14-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN R. CORDREY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HARRINGTON, Warden at Menard Prison, ALEX JONES, Assistant Warden of Operations at Menard Prison, L. PHELPS, Correctional Officer/Internal Affairs Investigator at Menard Prison and others
Coffey v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2010cv01009
Plaintiff:
John P Coffey
Defendant:
. Reynolds, . Porter, . Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
