Cases 11 - 20 of 51
King v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
Alexander Adam King
Defendant:
Hendricks, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coronado v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00148
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Kate Brown, Kate Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Coronado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coyle v. Brown et al
as 6:2021cv00149
Defendant:
Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Kate Brown, Kate Hendricks and others
Plaintiff:
James Henry Coyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Cain et al
as 2:2021cv00132
Defendant:
Betty Hawkins, M. Landaverde, Dr. Koltes and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jay Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv02153
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, C.O. K. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv02127
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown, Dir. Colette Peters, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv02102
Defendant:
Cpl. Manrick, Oregon Dept. of Corrections, Chaplain Pearlstein and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv02101
Defendant:
Governor Kate Brown, Dir. Colette Peters, Oregon Dept. of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Oregon Dept. of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv02018
Defendant:
C/O B. Peterson and Oregon Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Brown et al
as 6:2020cv01416
Plaintiff:
Tariq Muhammad
Defendant:
OSP Supt. Brandon Kelly, Dir. Colette Peters, Gov. Kate Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
