Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Orman et al v. Federal Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv02177
Plaintiff:
Amber Orman and Robert Sullivan
Defendant:
Federal Insurance Company
Not Classified By Court:
Gerald T. Albrecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
LIBBY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43895
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH ORMAN LIBBY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07687
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLAS ORMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92999
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ORMAN QUIN TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv84088
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ORMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv64555
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMY A ORMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN ORMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94693
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES VAN ORMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WITHERSPOON v. USA
as 4:2018cv00055
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ORMAN CURTIS WITHERSPOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Luxottica Group, S.p.A. v. M&M Sunglasses, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv61172
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group, S.p.A.
Defendant:
M&M Sunglasses, LLC , Mehmet Orman and Muge Orman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Orman v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Van A. Orman
Defendant:
Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
