Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Orozco v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05938
Plaintiff:
Rayona Orozco
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Women's Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rea v. Complete Maintenance Company
as 4:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jeslyn Rea, Michael Newfield and Erik Orozco
Defendant:
Complete Maintenance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Orozco v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00857
Plaintiff:
Sara Orozco
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Orozco-Dominguez v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03465
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Violeta Orozco-Dominguez
Defendant:
Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Daigle v. Omarov et al
as 2:2021cv00081
Plaintiff:
Damian Daigle
Defendant:
Makhach S. Omarov and Orozco Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orozco v. Jackson et al
as 1:2020cv01498
Defendant:
Quentin Jackson, Citadel Risk Services, Inc., Jonathan Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Lourdes Orozco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00198
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
