Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ostrander v. McCutchen et al
as 1:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Degaulle Enowruth, David Smith, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Glenn Ostrander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ostrander v. Turner et al
as 7:2020cv00099
Defendant:
Traci Cooke, Nikki Archer, James Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ostrander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ostrander v. Richerson
as 7:2017cv00143
Petitioner:
Daniel Glen Ostrander
Respondent:
Kendall Richerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ostrander v. Lindsey et al
as 6:2017cv00258
Defendant:
Warden Bruce Armstrong, Warden David Blackwell, Notary Brittney Star Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ostrander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ostrander v. Salvador et al
as 7:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ostrander
Defendant:
Adan I Salvador, Scott Szczepinski, Lea Broyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ostrander v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2015cv00804
Petitioner:
James Sterling Ostrander
Respondent:
William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ostrander v. Kosteck et al
as 6:2013cv00360
Defendant:
Kimberly Adams, V. Barrow, Nurse Teddy Beeman and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ostrander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ostrander v. Stephens
as 6:2013cv00306
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Sterling Ostrander
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ostrander v. Kosteck et al
as 6:2013cv00158
Defendant:
Kimberly Adams, V. Barrow, Nurse Teddy Beeman and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ostrander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godbehere v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID et al
as 6:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Roger Godbehere
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, TDCJ-ID, Todd Foxworth, Sean Ostrander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
