Cases 21 - 30 of 33
MATTHEWS v. PAUZE et al
as 1:2013cv01142
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
MICHAEL PAUZE, RYAN FAULCONER, ALICIA WOJTKONSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Otis Elevator Company v. Secretary of Labor, et al
as 13-1194
Petitioner:
Otis Elevator Company
Respondent:
Secretary of Labor, Department of Labor and Occupational Safety & Health Review Commission
HUDSON v. GRAY et al
as 1:2012cv01409
Plaintiff:
LEE OTIS HUDSON
Defendant:
VINCENT C. GRAY and OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN et al v. SCHAFER, et al
as 1:2009cv01422
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALLEN, GWENDOLYN ANDERSON, HENRY ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
ED SCHAFER and THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-5527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HARRIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2008cv00238
Plaintiff:
OTIS HARRIS, III
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-7023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-5063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BYRD v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2007cv00332
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL L. BYRD, JR.
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., OTIS THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
