Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Young v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01352
Plaintiff:
Otis Young
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
UPCHURCH v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Timothy Upchurch
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Godwin Elevator Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Mulder v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
Otis Mulder
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ball v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Otis Ball
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Crawford v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Otis Crawford
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
RAASCH et al v. CBL & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00146
Defendant:
CBL & ASSOCIATES, INC, CBL & ASSOCIATES, INC. also known as CBL & ASSOCIATES PROPERTIES, INC. doing business as HANES MALL, CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
RAASCH, ROBERT RAASCH and LINDA RAASCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Martinez v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
as 1:2010cv00953
Defendant:
OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Julio Alberto Zaldana Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CAIN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00866
Plaintiff:
BRENDA CAIN , AUSTIN RODDEN , BROOKE TOMPKINS and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foley v. Otis Elevator Company
as 7:2010cv00138
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Teresa M. Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hansard et al v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 7:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
Carol Hansard and Otis Lee Hansard
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation, Federal Express Corporation and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
