Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13161
Defendant:
OTIS STANTON, Former Statewide Tier Coordinator, ADRIAN NELSON, Statewide Tier Coordinator, ROBERT TOOLE, Field Operations Director and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-13073
Defendant:
ROBERT TOOLE, KENDRIC JACKSON, JUANITA SHARPE and others
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
DAKER v. Oliver
as 1:2024cv02687
Respondent:
Otis Stanton, Brian Dennis Adams, Justin Jones and others
Petitioner:
WASEEM DAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higdon v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2021cv00097
Plaintiff:
Roman Christian Higdon
Defendant:
Joshua Jones, Kevin Sprayberry and Otis Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
