Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Saeli v. WIVB-TV et al
as 6:2017cv06442
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
WIVB-TV, WNLO-YV, Nexstar Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saeli v. D'Agostino et al
as 6:2017cv06219
Plaintiff:
Samuel J. Saeli
Defendant:
John D'Agostino, The Observer Newspaper, The Owner/Parent Company of the Observer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
France v. Welcome Motor's Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
Robert G. France
Defendant:
Welcome Motor's Inc., Owner & President of Corporation, No. 1 Mark Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Help SEC USA Owner Staff/ John DOe
as 1:2015cv07763
Plaintiff:
Vernell Edwards
Defendant:
Help SEC USA Owner Staff/ John DOe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNair v. Heyman
as 1:2015cv04532
Plaintiff:
Larry McNair
Defendant:
Bud Heyman, Team West 4, Rachel Sukur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colon v. Destefano et al
as 1:2014cv04420
Plaintiff:
Hommy Colon
Defendant:
Joseph Destefano, Co Owner Joseph Destefano, Tiffany Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon v. Destefano et al
as 6:2014cv06250
Plaintiff:
Hommy Colon
Defendant:
Joseph Destefano, Co Owner Joseph Destefano, Tiffany Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Camden Resdental Hotel
as 14-734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dwinel Monroe
Defendant:
Camden Resdental Hotel, City of New York, New York City Police Department and others
Defendant - Appellee:
206 West Holding Corporation, Owner of Camden Hotel and John Baisley
Smith v. Hochul et al
as 1:2013cv01106
Plaintiff:
Brian Avery Smith
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattison v. New York Daily News.com et al
as 1:2013cv02009
Plaintiff:
Ernest Mattison
Defendant:
New York Daily News.com, Thomas Zambito, Publisher, Daily News.com and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
