Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Joseph Engel v. Corizon, et al
as 22-1347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant / Appellee:
Corizon, ERDCC, CO1 and others
Joseph Engel v. Unknown Correctional Officers, et al
as 21-2384
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Governor, Probation & Parole Director, Assistant Director of Religious Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Joseph Engel v. Corrections Officer I, et al
as 21-2077
Defendant / Appellee:
Lieutenant Governor, Corizon LPN, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Joseph Engel v. Corrections Officer I, et al
as 21-2067
Defendant / Appellee:
Religious Services Assistant Director, Superintendent, Captain and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Joseph Engel v. Unknown COI, et al
as 21-2005
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Corporal, Individual and Official Capacity, Corizon Assistant Superintendent, Individual and Official Capacity, Caseworks, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Joseph Engel v. CO1, et al
as 21-1597
Defendant / Appellee:
St. Louis County Drug Task Force, Lieutenant Governor, Unknown Superintendent and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Engel v. CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01923
Defendant:
Director, Assistant Warden, Director P&P and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. ERDCC et al
as 4:2020cv01827
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Att General, IPO ERDCC, P&P Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. ERDCC et al
as 4:2020cv01826
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Director, Major, IPO ERDCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01794
Defendant:
SG, Director, Govener and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
