Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Johnson v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq01290
Plaintiff:
Monte P. Johnson
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Johnson v. WEL Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04400
Defendant:
WEL Companies, Inc. and Donald Kernan
Plaintiff:
Harry P Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv03159
Defendant:
Shaved Ice Distributors LLC, Durk Banks, Chicago Sun Times and others
Plaintiff:
Miles P. Johnson and Jr. Miles P. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Jet Support Services, Inc.
as 1:2018cv06235
Plaintiff:
Ronald P Johnson
Defendant:
Jet Support Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv08273
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Johnson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Superintendent Julian, Sheriff Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv07523
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Johnson
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Nneka Jones Tapia, John Jay Shannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2015cv07996
Plaintiff:
Jerry P Johnson
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Tom Dart and Toni Preckwrinkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rocha et al v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv08666
Plaintiff:
Carlos G Rocha and Arize 11, Inc
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. , Daniel J. Sullivan, Rodger G. Marticke and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
