Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. J. Beard, et al
as 21-16368
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. BEARD, Director/Secretary of CDCR, D. L. RUNNELS, Warden, Warden of HDSP, J. PRICE, Warden, DVI and others
Paul Johnson v. D. Runnels, et al
as 21-15888
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, BINOYE NAKU, L. B. BROWN, Jr., MD at CDCR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. Mahmoud, et al
as 20-16498
Defendant:
J. PRICE, N. ACQUVA, F. KREITLER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
G. SWARTHOUT, Y. P. CHEN, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Paul Johnson v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 19-16485
Defendant / Appellee:
Y. P. CHEN, MD at CSP-SOL, W. ZHENG, MD for DVI, MAHMOUD, MD at CSP-SOL and others
Defendant:
A. TRAQUINA, MD at CSP-SOL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Johnson v. Beard
as 2:2015cv01313
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
J. A. Beard, D. L. Runnels, G. Swarthout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chen v. CCB Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv60939
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth P. Chen
Defendant:
CCB Credit Services, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Chen v. Creditors Financial Group, LLC
as 0:2011cv61541
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth P. Chen
Defendant:
Creditors Financial Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
