Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
JONES v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv06531
Plaintiff: BRYAN P. JONES
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JONES v. WALSH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01316
Plaintiff: LAWRENCE P. JONES
Respondent: JEROME WALSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TURBERG v. SUNOCO, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03831
Plaintiff: ELEANOR TURBERG
Defendant: SUNOCO, INC., IRENE C. BRITT, CHRIS C. CASCIATO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
HENRY v. CFCF/PHILADELPHIA PRISONS SYSTEM et al
as 2:2011cv07411
Plaintiff: MICHAEL S. HENRY
Defendant: CFCF/PHILADELPHIA PRISONS SYSTEM, DELANEY, MAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57445
Plaintiff: EUGENE P. JONES
Defendant: ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv58276
Plaintiff: EUGENE P JONES
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JONES, III v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52636
Plaintiff: LUCIOUS P JONES, III
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BURKE et al v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv67071
Plaintiff: ROBERT A. BURKE, JR. , EVELYN BURKE , ELBERT W. JONES and others
Defendant: JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv67073
Plaintiff: THELMA P. JONES
Defendant: PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, ET. AL.
as 2:2011cv35639
Plaintiff: EUGENE P. JONES
Defendant: MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, ET. AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?