Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Rivers v. City of American Canyon et al
as 3:2022cv01576
Defendant:
Valerina Prekaj, City of American Canyon, American Canyon Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Rivers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00495
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Dugar III v. Smith
as 3:2021cv08905
Plaintiff:
Ernest Dugar III
Defendant:
Susie P Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moradpour v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
Meysam Moradpour, Diane Smith and William P. Smith
Defendant:
Andrew Hamer, Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Anand Gopalan and others
Petitioner:
Brandon Welu, John Whitney, Krista Buccholz and others
Jesse Lowe v. Marc Thomas, et al
as 2:2021cv00597
Defendant:
Marc Thomas, David Norris, Wrap Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Lowe
Ray Westerman v. Marc Thomas et al
as 2:2021cv00550
Defendant:
Michael Parris, Wayne R Walker, David Norris and others
Plaintiff:
Ray Westerman
Pruitt et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv07272
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Cummins, Joseph F. Reece, Patrice Marie Pimentel and others
Defendant:
Safeway, Inc., Kaiser Permanente International, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, incorrectly designated as Doe 6 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davillier et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv00570
Plaintiff:
Leonard Easley, Joseph Allen Hays, Bernard Kevin Miller and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lui v. Farr et al
as 3:2020cv00390
Plaintiff:
Roy Lui
Defendant:
Renee P. Tannenbaum, Stephen J. Farr, Mark Wiggins and others
Smith v. Saul et al
as 3:2019cv08012
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Steven Breen and Terran O'Dell
Plaintiff:
Eileen P Smith
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
