Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MLI RX LLC et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02960
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly known as SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION doing business as GLAXOSMITHKLINE, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD and others
Plaintiff:
MLI RX LLC, AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORP., AMERISOURCEBERGEN DRUG CORP. and others
Interested Party:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.R. v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02824
Plaintiff:
P.R. and P. R.
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC, JOHN DOES 1-100, ALLERGAN, INC. and others
In Re:
IN RE: ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00428
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BELBIN et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv05583
Plaintiff:
DAVID BELBIN , ANDREW BAIN , MICHAEL BIELSKI and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00995
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC formerly SmithKline Beecham Corp. d/b/a/ GlaxoSmithKline and others
Interested Party:
MEIJER INC.
Amicus Curiae:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Lead Plaintiff:
KING DRUG COMPANY OF FLORENCE, INC., LOUISIANA WHOLESALE DRUG CO., INC. and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC.
Not Yet Classified:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC., MORRIS & DICKSON CO., L.L.C., FWK HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.R. et al v. ROXBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
as 2:2007cv05935
Plaintiff:
P.R. and C.R.
Defendant:
ROXBURY TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
