Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Flowers v. IDOC et al
as 1:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Halton Flowers
Defendant:
IDOC and Pam Sonnen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Thomas et al
as 1:2010cv00294
Plaintiff:
Barry Searcy
Defendant:
Martin Thomas, Kelly Brown, Terry Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood et al v. Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00277
Plaintiff:
Lance Conway Wood, James Earl Newman, Thomas Baccus, Jr and others
Defendant:
Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy, Caroling Melinie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly v. Zmuda et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly
Defendant:
Jefferey D Zmuda, Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00216
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Randolph
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Idaho State Board of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
Barry Searcy
Defendant:
Idaho State Board of Corrections, IDOC, Carolyn Meline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightner et al v. Valdez et al
as 1:2010cv00105
Plaintiff:
William Lightner and Marcia Lightner
Defendant:
Phillip Valdez, Pam Sonnen, Brent Reinke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf et al v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2009cv00632
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, Jimmy T. Glass, Patrick K. Knight and others
Defendant:
State of Idaho, State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lerajjarean Ra-o-kel-ly v. Michael Johnson
as 09-35712
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LERAJJAREAN RA-O-KEL-LY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JOHNSON, THOMAS BEAUCLAIR, BRENT REINKE and others
Goodrick v. Sonnen
as 1:2009cv00100
Plaintiff:
Dan Goodrick
Defendant:
Pam Sonnen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
