Cases 1 - 10 of 14
United States v. Serenil-Pantoja
as 23-2172
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO SERENIL-PANTOJA, AKA Cipriano Mata-Favela
Hickey v. GEO Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility et al
as 5:2023cv00733
Plaintiff:
Dedrick Lemont Hickey
Defendant:
GEO Lawton Correctional Rehabilitation Facility, Comanche County Commissioners, Bonnie Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drawhorn v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jerome Drawhorn
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, FNU Pantoja, FNU Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pantoja v. Progressive Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv00030
Defendant:
Westfield Insurance Company and Progressive Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Alberto Pantoja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melendez-Ramirez et al v. Tovar
as 2:2017cv02013
Defendant:
Johnathan Tovar
Plaintiff:
Pedro Juan Gonzalez-Pantoja and Jose M. Melendez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pantoja v. USA
as 1:2016cv00063
Petitioner:
Miguel Padilla Pantoja
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Pantoja et al
as 5:2015cv00688
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Moore
Defendant:
FNU Pantoja, FNU Harvey and Tina Mangalona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales-Pantoja v. Holder
as 14-9556
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL MORALES-PANTOJA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Gardner et al v. Living Art Tattoo Studio, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv01147
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gardner and Patrick Smith
Defendant:
Living Art Tattoo Studio, LLC and Michael Pantoja
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Robles-Pantoja v. Aulepp et al
as 5:2013cv03077
Plaintiff:
Javier Robles-Pantoja
Defendant:
Kristine Aulepp, Vasa Srinivasa and W. E. Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
