Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Evans-Panton v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 1:2024cv02980
Plaintiff:
Annika Evans-Panton
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Norford et al v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
DANE NORFORD and ROBERT PANTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07416
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv08916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Panton v. Joseph
as 1:2017cv07539
Petitioner:
Nadine Panton
Respondent:
Joseph Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Panton v. Ben Moha et al
as 1:2016cv00880
Plaintiff:
Philip Panton
Defendant:
Jacob Ben Moha and 694 Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hamilton et al v. Transitional Services for New York, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03599
Plaintiff:
Debra Hamilton , Henrietta U. Ilomudio and Tony J. Goodman
Defendant:
Transitional Services for New York, Inc. , Melinda Pantone , Larry S. Grubler and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Avila v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01108
Defendant:
Police Officer Alba, John and Jane Doe Police Officers and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Panton Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Panton v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01829
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Robert Panton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
City of New York , Center for Animal Care and Control, Michael Bloomberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
