Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rakic et al v. Papillon Airways, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Cedomir Rakic, Amy Rakic and Maddison Rakic
Defendant:
Papillon Airways, Inc. doing business as Papillon Grand Canyon Helicopters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Airline Crash
Not Used
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Cedomir Rakic, Amy Rakic, Maddison Rakic and others
Defendant:
Papillon Airways, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Airline Crash
Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc., et al
as 18-16396
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY RIGGS, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, for the benefit of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, and PHILIP AND MARLENE UDALL as Next of Kin and Natural Parents of JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, deceased
Defendant / Appellant:
AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW HECKER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, BRENDA HALVORSON and others
Amicus Curiae:
GENERAL AVIATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
Mary Riggs v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc., et al
as 18-16396
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARY RIGGS, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, for the benefit of the ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, and PHILIP AND MARLENE UDALL as Next of Kin and Natural Parents of JONATHAN NEIL UDALL, deceased
Defendant - Appellant:
AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW HECKER, DANIEL FRIEDMAN, BRENDA HALVORSON and others
Riggs et al v. Airbus Helicopters, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00912
Defendant:
Airbus Helicopters, S.A.S., Scott Booth, Brenda Halvorson and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Riggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
PAPILLON AIRWAYS, INC v. USA
as 1:2009cv00297
Plaintiff:
PAPILLON AIRWAYS, INC
Defendant:
USA
Counter_claimant:
USA
Counter_defendant:
PAPILLON AIRWAYS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
