Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Awe v. Homann et al
as 1:2012cv09701
Plaintiff:
Jaime Awe
Defendant:
William J. Homann, The Estate of Anna Mitchell-Hedges, The Estate of F.A. Mitchell-Hedges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sigler et al v. Paramount Pictures Corporation
as 1:2012cv04786
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jacob Sigler and Eastpointe 10 Movies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brownmark Films, LLC v. Comedy Partners, et al
as 11-2620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BROWNMARK FILMS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
COMEDY PARTNERS, MTV NETWORKS, PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORPORATION and others
Brownmark Films, LLC v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01013
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Viacom International Inc, Comedy Partners and others
Plaintiff:
Brownmark Films, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Romo et al v. Paramount Pictures Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv06904
Defendant:
Paramount Pictures Corporation , D.W. Studio Productions LLC , Ryerson Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Adolfo Romo and Gabriella Cedillo, a Disabled Person
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paramount Pictures Corporation v. Yarbrough
as 2:2008cv00489
Plaintiff:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Paramount Pictures Corporation and Paramount Pictures Corporation
Defendant:
Mattie Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. et al v. Kent
as 1:2007cv00734
Plaintiff:
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. and others
Defendant:
John Kent
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Paramount Pictures Corporation et al v. Guzman
as 1:2007cv00735
Plaintiff:
Paramount Pictures Corporation, Paramount Pictures Corporation, Paramount Pictures Corporation and others
Defendant:
Herculano Guzman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
