Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Baque et al v. Hendrick Automotive Group LLC
as 2:2024cv03041
Defendant:
Hendrick Automotive Group LLC doing business as Hendrick Toyota North Charleston formerly known as Hendrick Automotive Group, Hendrick Corporation, LLC, Hendrick Automotive Group and others
Plaintiff:
Yuliet Jiminez Baque, Devora Brown, Maria Salazar Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Braten v. The Parker Operator LLC
as 6:2022cv04529
Plaintiff:
Milton Braten
Defendant:
The Parker Operator LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Bi-Lo LLC v. Parker
as 5:2019cv03213
Petitioner:
Bi-Lo LLC
Respondent:
Alfreida Parker
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Parker et al v. Diamond Resorts US Collection Development LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03191
Plaintiff:
Terry Parker and Mary Parker
Defendant:
Barclays Bank Delaware, Diamond Resorts Financial Services Inc and Diamond Resorts US Collection Development LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rogers v. Parker Hannifin Corporation
as 2:2014cv01189
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Rogers
Defendant:
Parker Hannifin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Southern v. Asbestos Processing LLC et al
as 0:2011cv01800
Plaintiff:
Lucille Southern , Odell Parker , Ruth Parker and others
Defendant:
Asbestos Processing LLC, Richard H Bishoff PC, Richard H Bishoff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crown Castle South LLC v. Parker et al
as 7:2010cv00173
Plaintiff:
Crown Castle South LLC
Defendant:
Henry C Parker and Frances McDaniel Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Consolidated Insured Benefits Inc v. Parker and Associates Inc
as 6:2009cv02238
Plaintiff:
Consolidated Insured Benefits Inc and Consolidated Insured Benefits Inc
Defendant:
Parker and Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
