Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jensen v. Terrell et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Cody John Jensen
Defendant:
ADA Coordinator Terrell, Counselor Jackson, Mr. Pascal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Jordan et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Marlon Maurice Ellis and Champ
Defendant:
Lt. Jordan and Warden Pascal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
Wesley Vandale Harris and Mrs. Deborah Jayce King Fulton
Defendant:
Mr. Timothy C. Ward, Mr. Terry E. Barnard, Mr. Stand Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03669
Plaintiff:
Pascale Davis
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAITHER v. DEAL et al
as 1:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Dr. Harvey, Mr. Pascal, Nathan Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAITHER v. DEAL et al
as 4:2021cv00034
Defendant:
WARDEN PHILBIN, Deputy Warden PASCAL, Deputy Warden HARVEY and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL GAITHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaither v. Deal et al
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Mr. Pascal, Mrs. Harvey, Nathan Deal and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. POWELL et al
as 7:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
RON JAMES, Officer ROLLINS, PRESTON ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
