Cases 11 - 20 of 64
PAXTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07562
Plaintiff:
Robert Paxton
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carellas v. Wesley et al
as 6:2022cv00489
Plaintiff:
Stephanos Carellas
Defendant:
Robert Wesley, Tamara Greer, Caleb Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adolphe v. Quinones et al
as 6:2022cv00352
Plaintiff:
Jean Rony Adolphe
Defendant:
Louis A. Quinones, Jr., Jospeh Cameron, Dan Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carellas v. Quinones, Jr et al
as 6:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Stephanos Joseph George Carellas and Stephanos Carellas
Defendant:
Louis A. Quinones, Jr and Dan Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Obenauer v. Paxton et al
as 6:2021cv01776
Plaintiff:
Leandro Obenauer
Defendant:
Dan Paxton, Rebecca Smith Hammeroff and Brian Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAXTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66742
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PAXTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv66359
Plaintiff:
PAXTON FLOWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAXTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65935
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PAXTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAXTON v. AEARO HOLDING LLC et al
as 7:2021cv55822
Plaintiff:
RICHARD PAXTON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
