Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Baby Products Antitrust, et al, et al
as 15-1532
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL M. MCDONOUGH
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLISON LEDERER
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE LINDEMANN, TOYS R US INC, BABIES R US INC and others
In Re: Baby Products Antitrust, et al, et al
as 15-1456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN YOUNG
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL M. MCDONOUGH, EVELIA Y. RAGSDALE, SARA SHUCK and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE LINDEMANN, TOYS R US INC, BABIES R US INC and others
In Re: Baby Products Antitrust, et al, et al
as 15-1468
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL M. MCDONOUGH, EVELIA Y. RAGSDALE, SARA SHUCK and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARK HAMPE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYS R US INC, BABIES R US INC, TOYS R US DELAWARE INC and others
In Re: Baby Products Antitrust, et al, et al
as 15-1455
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL M. MCDONOUGH, EVELIA Y. RAGSDALE, SARA SHUCK and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM MORRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE LINDEMANN, TOYS R US INC, BABIES R US INC and others
In re: Baby Products Antitrust, et al, et al
as 12-1166
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL M. MCDONOUGH
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARK HAMPE
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYS R US INC, RP, BABIES R US INC, TOYS R US DE INC and others
In re: Baby Products Antitrust, et al, et al
as 12-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN YOUNG
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL M. MCDONOUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYS R US INC, RP, BABIES R US INC, TOYS R US DE INC and others
In re: Baby Products Antitrust, et al, et al
as 12-1167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLISON LEDERER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CAROL M. MCDONOUGH
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYS R US INC, RP, BABIES R US INC, TOYS R US DE INC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
