Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Scott Marcum, et al v. Columbia Gas Transmission LLC, et al
as 23-1434
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT R. MARCUM and KERSTIN R. MARCUM
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION LLC, COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION COMMUNICATIONS CORP, CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORP, a/k/a Crown Castle Internatinoal I, LLC; a/k/a Crown Castle Fiber LLC and others
Defendant:
CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORP and PERCHERON LLC
Scott Marcum, et al v. Columbia Gas Transmission LLC, et al
as 23-1428
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SCOTT R. MARCUM and KERSTIN R. MARCUM
Defendant / Appellant:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION COMMUNICATIONS CORP, CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORP, a/k/a Crown Castle Internatinoal I, LLC; a/k/a Crown Castle Fiber LLC and PERCHERON LLC, a/k/a Percheron Field Services LLC; a/k/a Percheron Energy LLC; a/k/a Percheron Professional Services LLC
Defendant:
CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORP and PERCHERON LLC
MARCUM v. COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv03873
Defendant:
PERCHERON, LLC, CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORP., CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL I and others
Plaintiff:
KERSTIN R. MARCUM and SCOTT R. MARCUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
HUMPHREY et al v. PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv06556
Plaintiff:
DAVE HUMPHREY and ROB NASH
Defendant:
PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC and PERCHERON LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Haskett v. Percheron, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00257
Plaintiff:
Phillip David Haskett
Defendant:
Percheron, LLC, Unknown Clients of Percheron #1 - #9 and Jon Doughs #1 - #9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Haskett v. Percheron LLC et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 3:14-MC-17. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 3:2014mc00017
Plaintiff:
Phillip David Haskett
Defendant:
Percheron LLC, Unknown Clients of Percheron #1-#9 and Jon Doughs #1-#9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
