Cases 1 - 10 of 756
Taylor v. Higashi et al
as 1:2024cv00118
Defendant:
Cleofe, Gaga Higashi, Myron T. Higashi, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Shella Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jose Guzman et al v. The Western Union Company et al
as 5:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jose Guzman, Fortino Rutilo Jimenez, Bertha Meza individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
The Western Union Company, Moneygram International, Inc., Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
