Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Dancy v. USP Coleman 1 Staff et al
as 5:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
USP Coleman 1 Staff, S. Withers, FNU Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dancy v. Stephens et al
as 5:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Larry Dancy
Defendant:
FNU Stephens, FNU DeAngelo, FNU Pachuilla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wingfield v. Harr et al
as 5:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Wingfield
Defendant:
FNU Harr, FNU Bolstick, FNU Withers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gorbey v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owl Feather Gorbey
Defendant:
Brian J. Davis, Federal Bureau of Prisions, John Doe # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Toomey
as 3:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Judge Joel B. Toomey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps v. Dixon
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 5:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
John Doe, FNU Valistero, FNU Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Kimbrell
as 3:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Kimbrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Oritz et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Johnny Mack
Defendant:
FNU Oritz, FNU Bowers, U.D.C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Phelps v. Inch et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Phelps
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Don Davis, G. Emanoilidis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
