Cases 1 - 10 of 34
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE EL v. PARCHEM et al
as 1:2023cv03121
Plaintiff:
COLBY JEROME HALE EL
Defendant:
PARCHEM, TRUJILLO and PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. DC JAIL
as 1:2021cv03090
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
DC JAIL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REED v. CUSHWA et al
as 1:2021cv02530
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW REED
Defendant:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, JENNIFER DAVIS, JEQUAN JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS et al v. BOOTH et al
as 1:2020cv00849
Defendant:
QUINCY L. BOOTH and LENNARD JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BANKS, ERIC SMITH, D'ANGELO PHILLIPS and others
Petitioner:
FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS LABOR COMMITTEE
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FREEMAN v. PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2019cv02569
Plaintiff:
MARCUS R. FREEMAN and MARCELLUS R. FREEMAN
Defendant:
REGGIE B. WALTON, ROD J. ROSENSTEIN, CHANNING D. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DUCKETT v. USA
as 1:2018cv01595
Petitioner:
PHILLIP ERIC DUCKETT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PIERCE v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2017cv02296
Petitioner:
SEAVON PIERCE
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, KAMALA D. HARRIS, VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01194
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSEBAR et al v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2017cv00978
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROSEBAR and ERIN ROSEBAR
Defendant:
DAVID BROOKS, WENDELL ROBINSON, WILLIAM C. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
