Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Bonilla v. Plumas County Grand Jury
as 3:2017cv06372
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Plumas County Grand Jury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Plumas County Superior Court
as 3:2017cv04696
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Plumas County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017at00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
United States Department of Justice, Tax Division v. Pflum et al
as 2:2015cv02659
Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice, Tax Division
Defendant:
David Pflum, Pilot Enterprise LLC, Friday Harbor WY, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Nichols v. Plumas County Correctional Facility
as 2:2015cv01299
Plaintiff:
Gerald Edmund Nichols
Defendant:
Plumas County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamori-Holmes v. Plumas County Mental Health Services et al
as 2:2012cv01977
Plaintiff:
Robin Gail Tamori-Holmes
Defendant:
Plumas County , Country Villa Merced Behavioral Health Center , Cal Osha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Tamori-Holmes v. Plumas County et al
as 2:2012at01047
Plaintiff:
Robin Gail Tamori-Holmes
Defendant:
Plumas County , Country Villa Merced Behavioral Health Center , CAL OSHA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Papenhausen v. Hollister et al
as 2:2012cv00344
Plaintiff:
Scott Everett Papenhausen
Defendant:
David Hollister, Greg Hagwood, Plumas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nava v. Hagwood, et al
as 2:2011cv03379
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bert Nava
Defendant:
Hagwood and Plumas County Mental Health Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
