Antitrust Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Allergan, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00972
Defendant: Allergan, Inc.
Plaintiff: Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2018md02819
Defendant: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff: Allergan, Inc., 1199SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund, 1199SEIU Licensed Practical Nurses Welfare Fund and others
In Re: In Re: Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
Petitioner: Akorn Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated v. Allergan, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00011
Plaintiff: Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: Allergan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01763
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. , TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND et al v. FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01756
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND
Movant: NECA-IBEW WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant: FOUGERA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , SANDOZ, INC. , NOVARTIS INTERNATIONAL AG and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND et al v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01766
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND , 1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN
Defendant: LANNETT COMPANY, INC. , MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and SANDOZ, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
CESAR CASTILLO, INC. et al v. SANDOZ, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01667
Plaintiff: CESAR CASTILLO, INC. , 1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND , AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN and others
Defendant: SANDOZ, INC., NOVARTIS AG, LANNETT COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. et al v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01665
Plaintiff: FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. , 1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN and others
Consol_plaintiff: CESAR CASTILLO, INC. and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN
Defendant: LANNETT COMPANY, INC. , MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , SANDOZ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01361
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., UPSHER-SMITH LABORATORIES, INC., PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00144
Plaintiff: PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 178 HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND
Defendant: ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?