Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PNC Bank, National Association v. Parker et al
as 1:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Michael T. Parker, Melissa Silva-Parker, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Zhen v. PNC Bank, National Association
as 1:2021cv00273
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Pat Zhen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Padilla v. PNC Bank
as 1:2018cv00131
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Yovany Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meza et al v. PNC Bank, National Association
as 1:2017cv00308
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Meza , Joaquin Meza, Jr. , Kimberly Gilo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dan-Harry v. PNC Bank, National Association
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Dawari Dan-Harry
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. CEDAR CREEK OF EAST ALABAMA LLC et al
as 2:2016mc00358
Plaintiff:
PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
CEDAR CREEK OF EAST ALABAMA LLC and LEE D ROBERSON
PNC Bank, National Association v. Will et al
as 1:2015mc00009
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Christine L. Will and Herbert W. Will
Chesley v. PNC Bank, National Association
as 1:2015cv00091
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chesley
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Driscoll v. PNC Bank, National Association
as 1:2013cv12112
Plaintiff:
Kerrie Driscoll
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Bravo v. PNC Bank, National Assoc. et al
as 1:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
Jorge Bravo and Clorinda Bravo
Defendant:
PNC Bank, National Association , PNC Mortgage Services, Inc. and Government National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
