Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Polar Corp. v. Saratoga Spring Water Company
as 1:2023cv11285
Plaintiff:
Polar Corp.
Defendant:
Saratoga Spring Water Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Polar Corp. v. Saratoga Spring Water Company
as 4:2023cv11285
Plaintiff:
Polar Corp. doing business as Polar Beverages
Defendant:
Saratoga Spring Water Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Polar Corp. v. Circle K Stores, Inc.
as 4:2023cv40052
Plaintiff:
Polar Corp.
Defendant:
CIRCLE K STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Fitzgerald v. Polar Corp.
as 1:2020cv10877
Defendant:
Polar Corp.
Plaintiff:
Theresa Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal Insurance Company v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv11043
Plaintiff:
Federal Insurance Company
Defendant:
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc., TGT Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Body Science LLC v. Polar Electro Inc.
as 1:2012cv11668
Plaintiff:
Body Science LLC
Defendant:
Polar Electro Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In Re: Body Science LLC Patent Litigation
as 1:2012md02375
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Body Science LLC
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Polar Electro Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Polar Corporation v. PepsiCo, Inc et al
as 4:2011cv40021
Plaintiff:
Polar Corporation
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc, and The Concentrate Manufacturing Company of Ireland
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
