Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Ifeji v. Garland
as 24-484
Defendant:
BRETT EISELE, central pinal justice court precinct 3 judge et al., Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, MARIAN BROWN, dallas county sherrif et al., DALLAS COUNTY SHERRIFS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, GLENN HEGAR, texas secretary of state et al., TEXAS COMPTROLLERS OFFICE HEIRS AND ASSIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI, a Mooress beneficiary EMPRESS JAZLIN TRUST A Empress, Admiral, Mariner A, Merchant, Piloter Nations a private Moor aboriginal texan national territory of Spain, JAZZLYN SHABERA IFEJI ESTATE ET. AL., beneficiary, JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR ESTATE ET AL., beneficiary JOSEPH EDDIE PRYOR et al. and others
Krul v. DeJoy
as 24-314
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELLE M. KRUL
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS KELLY, LISA LYNCH, JOHN DOE(S) and others
Defendant:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Shackleford v. Dejoy
as 24-204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVE D. SHACKLEFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Mr., Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, USPS, GARY BARKSDALE, Mr., Inspector General and others
Barclay v. Dixon
as 24-92
Defendant / Appellee:
MAKAYLA COOK, Police Officer, Sandusky Police Department, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Makayla Cook, TIM MCCONAHAY, Warden, Mansfield Correctional Facility, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Tim Mcconahay, ROBERT A. DIXON, Attorney, Attorney at Law, Heirs and Assigns D/B/A Robert A. Dixon and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LESHAWN MAURICE BARCLAY, a Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Merchant, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal ohioan national, and subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
barclay et al v. dixon et al
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff:
leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant:
webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05795
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brown v. Blinken
as 22-2918
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore benefiiciary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire and Kenneth Anderson Brown, a Moore beneficiary, and Admiral, mariner, Merchant, Piloter and private people called Moor and subject, consul and Noble of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Antony John Blinken, Secretary of State, United States, Janet Louise Yellen, Secretary of Treasury, United States, Heirs & Assignees, Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner, SSA, Heirs & Assignees and others
Todd v. Eisele
as 22-1995
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronnie Ramael Todd, Moor beneficiary Ramael Black Well El Trust a Emperor, Admiral, Mariner, Piloter a private Moor aboriginal new yorker national, and Subject of the Al Maroc Shereefian Empire
Defendant / Appellee:
Brett Eisele, Central Pinal Justice Court Precinct 3 et al.,, Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State et al.,, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security et al., and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
