Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 U.S. Services Employment/Reemployment Act of 1994
Prokopev v. Lunegov et al
as 6:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
OLEG S PROKOPEV and Oleg S. Prokopev
Defendant:
EVGENY IGOREVICH LUNEGOV, TATIANA LUNEGOVA, ALFA PRO INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Emmanuel Adeyinka v. Web.com, et al
as 22-13981
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL ADEYINKA
Defendant / Appellee:
WEB.COM, WEBSITE PRO INC. and CHRISTOPHER FAGBOLU
Flores v. Remove It Pros, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Rafael R. Flores
Defendant:
REMOVE IT PROS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HAYS et al
as 1:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
DOMINICK HAYS, ODIS DOWNER, III and ASPHALT PRO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Adeyinka v. Web.com et al
as 3:2022cv00773
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Adeyinka
Defendant:
Web.com, Website Pro Inc. and Christopher Fagbolu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
EXPRESS OIL CHANGE LLC v. GREASE PRO INC
as 5:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
Express Oil Change, LLC and EXPRESS OIL CHANGE LLC
Defendant:
GREASE PRO INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Blanco v. Bug Out Pro, Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv62483
Plaintiff:
JORGE BLANCO
Defendant:
BUG OUT PRO, INC. and TODD R. COLLIGAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
FERGUSON v. 1800 TAX TEAM PROS, INC. et al
as 0:2018cv60922
Plaintiff:
ROSAN FERGUSON and CHRIS RIGBY
Defendant:
1800 TAX TEAM PROS, INC. , 1800 TAX PRO, INC. , MELANIE SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Amos v. Cam Pro, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
Charles Amos
Defendant:
Cam Pro, Inc. and Jesse Burke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
